I am sure that not many of us are unaware that
recently there was a priest in Akwa Ibom who resigned. Before we go into what
according to the Church, happens when a priest resigns, I think we should first
ask whether or not a priest can actually resign. The answer is Yes. And. No.
While the Church teaches that “you are a
priest forever” (Ps. 110.4). The fact that one nevertheless occasionally
encounters an “ex-priest” would therefore appear to be a contradiction. There
is a delicate distinction that must be made between the metaphysical fact that
a man is always a priest once he has been ordained, and the canonical status of
a laicized priest. The CCC (1582) states that the sacrament of Holy Orders
confers an “indelible spiritual character” on the man who receives it."
Like the sacrament of Baptism, it can never be erased—a baptized Christian can
cease to practice his faith, and even publicly deny Christ, but he can never
undo his baptism. Priestly ordination works in exactly the same way. Similarly,
canon 290 of the CCL states bluntly that once a man validly receives sacred
ordination, the sacrament never becomes invalid.
At the same time, however, it is possible for
a priest to be released from the duties and responsibilities that are connected
to the clerical state (CCC 1583). Practically speaking, this would mean that a
priest no longer functioned outwardly as a priest. He would no longer engage in
ministry within his diocese or religious institute; no longer celebrate Mass or
confer the sacraments; no longer be called “Father” or wear clerical clothing;
and no longer be supported financially by the Church. To the world he would
appear to be a layman, working at an ordinary job and living the normal life of
the laity. Canon law refers to this change as the “loss of the clerical state”
(cf. cc. 290-293 ). Common parlance calls it laicization.
There are two reasons a priest might lose the
clerical state. It can be imposed upon him, as the most serious penalty if he
has committed an ecclesiastical crime, but that does not take place very
often—thank God. Ordinarily, it happens because a priest voluntarily requests
it. For any number of reasons, he may conclude that he cannot continue living
the life of a priest. Ideally, of course, the realization that it will be
impossible to live and work as a priest for the rest of one’s life should be
reached when a man is still a seminarian but sometimes life simply doesn’t work
that way. Various combinations of emotional and health issues, deaths and other
events within the priest’s family, and of course the immense stress of being
constantly overworked while feeling unappreciated may lead a priest to reach
this decision after he is already ordained and engaged in priestly ministry.
When this occurs, and a priest is released from the clerical state, he is still
technically a priest, but as canon 292 notes, he may no longer exercise the
power of orders. Since this is what the priest is requesting anyway, there is
usually little fear that he will violate this restriction. But the interesting
thing is that in theory, if a laicized priest were to celebrate Mass, it would
be a valid Mass, since he never loses the ability to celebrate the Eucharist.
It would, however, be illicit (Future Post: WHAT IS AN ILLICIT SACRAMENT?).
Theoretically, if at some point in the future
the laicized priest changed his mind, and wanted to live as a priest again,
this would be canonically possible—but he would have to receive permission to
be once more “re-instated” directly from Rome (CCL 293). For obvious reasons,
the Church does not want undecided men easily moving back and forth, in and out
of the priestly state! But in any case, a previously-laicized priest returning
to ministry would not be ordained again, as he would still be an ordained
priest already. The fact that it is impossible to “un-ordain” or "re-ordain"
a priest explains the otherwise curious wording of canon 976. This canon states
that any priest, even one who lacks the faculty to hear confessions, can
validly and licitly hear the confession of anyone who is in danger of death.
Thus even a laicized priest, who certainly has lost his confessional faculties,
can hear the confession of someone who is dying. In fact, canon 986.2 goes even
farther: in an urgent situation, every priest is obliged to hear the confession
of a Catholic in danger of death. If, for example, a priest who had lost the
clerical state were driving home and encountered a car accident, and found
there a Catholic victim who at least appeared to be near death, that laicized
priest would actually be required under canon law to hear his confession and
grant him absolution. This is, of course, totally in keeping with the
theological concept that an ordained priest always remains a priest.
To return to the main issue, can a laicized
priest get married? We all know that as a discipline, Catholic clergy are
required to be celibate (c. 277.1). An exception would be found in some
countries among the clergy of many of the Catholic Churches that are not of the
Latin rite (Future Post: ARE THEY CATHOLICS?). One might presume that once a
priest has been reduced to the lay state, his obligation to remain celibate
ceases. But not so fast. Canon 291 addresses this issue specifically, and notes
that the loss of the clerical state does not carry with it an automatic
dispensation from the requirement to stay celibate. In fact, such a
dispensation would have to be requested separately, and can only be granted by
the Pope himself.
While the law clearly does provide for this possibility, it is well known in canonical circles that St. Pope John Paul II, who promulgated the current code that includes this canon, for many years routinely, denied all requests for this dispensation. While Francis has only been Pope for a comparatively short time, it is difficult to imagine that he will in the future take a radically different stance on this issue. This means that practically speaking, while a priest can receive permission to leave the active priesthood, he frequently will not receive permission to marry. So if this priest in Akwa Ibom goes ahead and marry after his resignation has been accepted, what conclusions can be drawn from this?
While the law clearly does provide for this possibility, it is well known in canonical circles that St. Pope John Paul II, who promulgated the current code that includes this canon, for many years routinely, denied all requests for this dispensation. While Francis has only been Pope for a comparatively short time, it is difficult to imagine that he will in the future take a radically different stance on this issue. This means that practically speaking, while a priest can receive permission to leave the active priesthood, he frequently will not receive permission to marry. So if this priest in Akwa Ibom goes ahead and marry after his resignation has been accepted, what conclusions can be drawn from this?
It is entirely possible he received permission
to marry; or perhaps the priest constituted an extremely rare exception to this
unofficial rule. But unfortunately there is another possibility. Some priests
have simply walked away from the Catholic Church entirely, and have married
outside the Church without obtaining (or often without even seeking) permission
from their superiors. While individual circumstances can vary, their status is
often akin to that of a soldier who has “gone AWOL.” These priests fall under
the provisions of canon 1394.1, which notes that a cleric who attempts marriage
incurs suspension; and canon 194.1 n.3, which states that a cleric who attempts
marriage "ipso facto" loses any ecclesiastical office he may have.
Note that both of these canons speak of “attempting marriage.” There are two
reasons for this phraseology. Firstly, canon 1087 asserts unequivocally that a
man who has been ordained cannot validly marry in the Church—any such marriage
will automatically be invalid. Secondly, if a priest (or any other Catholic,
for that matter!) marries in a non-Catholic ceremony without receiving any
permission from proper church authorities, the marriage will not be recognized
by the Catholic Church as a valid marriage anyway. So in both cases it is not
marriage in the eyes of the Church but an "attempted marriage". Thus
this terminology is very exact.
To sum up, we can see
that both Catholic theology and canon law acknowledge that sacred ordination is
forever, but there are real-life situations where it is possible for an
ordained priest to live as a layman and still be a Catholic in good standing.
There are nevertheless some other priests who have turned their backs entirely
on the Church, and while they too remain Catholic priests in actual fact, their
status within the Church has yet to be straightened out. Let’s pray for these
priests to return and take steps to regularize their canonical situation. And
let’s also pray that all Catholic priests be given the graces and strength they
need to persevere in their often difficult ministry, which is so critical to
the continued life of the Church in earth.
Comments
Post a Comment